A recent controversy has erupted over proposed amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law, specifically surrounding the outcome of the decision in the West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Company case. The proposed amendments seek to address issues raised in the court’s ruling, which deemed certain provisions in a stockholder agreement to be invalid under Section 141(a) of the DGCL.
The proposed amendments, introduced as Senate Bill 313 to the Delaware General Assembly, have stirred opposition from various quarters, with over 50 law professors expressing their disapproval in a letter to the Delaware legislature. Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick also raised concerns in a letter to the Delaware State Bar Committee, criticizing the speed at which the amendments were being pushed through.
Critics argue that the proposed amendments would grant corporate boards excessive power to enter into contracts that could potentially undermine shareholder rights and corporate governance principles. They emphasize the need for careful judicial review rather than hasty legislative actions. The amendments have been described as major surgery on the Delaware corporate law and have sparked discussions on the implications for corporate theory and legal doctrine.
The controversy highlights the importance of a deliberative and inclusive process in amending corporate laws, ensuring that diverse viewpoints are considered before enacting significant changes. Critics caution against rushing through changes that could have far-reaching consequences for Delaware’s corporate law framework. The outcome of this debate will likely have a lasting impact on corporate governance practices in the state.
Source
Photo credit www.jdsupra.com