A couple, Helen and Roger, are at odds over whether to train their beloved white German shepherd, Eddie, to bite in order to enter him in a dog competition called IGP. Helen is concerned about the risks involved, especially with their unpredictable baby in the house, while Roger believes that training Eddie to bite will not make him less safe and is key to fulfilling his dream. Roger insists that police dogs, who are trained to bite, do not randomly attack.
Roger is adamant about Eddie competing, as it would fulfill his passion for training dogs and help maintain his mental and physical health. He believes that IGP, which was developed as a breeding standard for German shepherds in Germany, is a perfect competition for Eddie. However, Helen is worried about the potential consequences if Eddie were to be trained to bite, including the risk of liability and her family’s safety.
The opinions of Guardian readers are split, with some criticizing Roger for prioritizing the dog’s career over his family’s well-being. Others suggest that Roger should consider alternative activities for Eddie that are safer and more family-friendly. The readers highlight the importance of compromise and considering the overall impact on the family.
The article presents a complex ethical dilemma between pursuing personal dreams and ensuring the safety and well-being of loved ones. It calls into question the responsibility of pet owners in training their animals and the potential risks involved. Ultimately, the decision on whether Roger’s argument is justified is left to the readers through an online poll.
Source
Photo credit www.theguardian.com
